Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.59 seconds)The Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Union Of India vs M/S Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. on 19 May, 2022
14. Thereafter, refund was sanctioned to
the petitioner by the concerned authority
by passing a reasoned order. However, the
GST department decided to prefer an appeal
Page 10 of 27
Uploaded by RAGHUNATH R NAIR(HC00196) on Fri Oct 04 2024 Downloaded on : Sat Oct 05 22:16:09 IST 2024
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/19481/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 19/09/2024
undefined
against such refund sanction orders under
Section 107 of the GST Act on the
principal ground that the contracts in
question were FOB import contracts and
therefore judgment of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Mohit Minerals Pvt.
Ltd. (supra) was not applicable.
The Customs Act, 1962
Section 12 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Article 265 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 April, 2004
Once
the notification itself has been
declared as ultra vires and the
same has been upheld by the
Supreme Court, in our opinion,
following the mandate of the
settled principle of law as laid
down in "Ms. Kusum Ingots & Alloys
Ltd vs Union Of India And
Anr."(AIR 2004 SC 2321), the
notification in no manner was
available to the State Authorities
to be applied as it would amount
to applying an illegal
notification. For this reason
also, the show cause notice is
rendered without jurisdiction."