Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.25 seconds)THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd.,And ... vs The Union Of India And Others(And ... on 8 January, 1958
In the Express Newspapers case (supra) a scheme making gratuity payable at the end of three years was upheld except in one particular aspect (See paragraph 202).
Section 4 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25FFF in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs The Union Of India(With Connected ... on 9 April, 1957
23. The meaning to be attributed to the expression "prize competitions" in Section 2(d) of the Prize Competitions Act (42 of 1955) was considered by the Supreme Court in R.M.D. Chamarbaugwaila and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr. . The question arose in circumstances stated thus in paragraph 5 of the judgment:
The Lord Krishna Sugar Mills Ltd.,And ... vs The Union Of India And Another(And ... on 6 May, 1959
24. There is an elaborate discussion in the judgment of the principles of severability. The question whether a statute can be saved in part if that part did not offend the Constitution and the principles to be applied in deciding whether a statute can be saved in that manner have also been discussed at length. Further whether a limited meaning should be given to words or expressions in a statute was also dealt with in this connection reference was made to the decision of the Federal Court in 1941 F.C.R. 12 wherein the word "property" in Act 18 of 1937 was construed as property other than agricultural land. "The validity of that statute was upheld by the Federal Court after construing the word "property" to mean property other than agricultural land. And it was held in R.M.D. Chamar baugwaila and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr. , that even if the definition in Section 2(d) of the Prize Competition Act considered therein is wide enough to comprehend all kinds of competitions it will apply only to such competitions in which success does no, depend to any substantial extent on skill.