Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.59 seconds)
H.A.Siddiq vs State Of Kerala on 27 March, 2024 cites

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru ... vs State Of Kerala And Anr on 24 April, 1973

NO.1723 OF 2024 -4- Others v. State of Kerala, [2020 (4) KHC 603], Prakashan v. State of Kerala [2023 (1) KHC 536] and Gopi v. State of Kerala [2024 KHC 18]. He also relied on the provisions under Section 72 of the Act, Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India and Section 25(3) of the Evidence Act, to fortify his contention that a confession recorded by a Forest Officer cannot be used in evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 573 - Cited by 999 - Full Document

Badku Joti Savant vs State Of Mysore on 1 March, 1966

6. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the application. She placed reliance on the decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court in Badku Joti Savant v State of Mysore [ AIR 1966 SC 1746] Moti Lal v. Central Bureau of Investigation [2001 KHC 2250] and the decisions of this Court in Forest Range Officer v. Aboobacker [1989 KHC 201] and Kunhali and others v. Forest Range Officer and another [2012 KHC 231], to canvass the position that the confession recorded by the forest officer is admissible in evidence. She contended that the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners is untenable. In addition to the above contention, BAIL APPL. NO.1723 OF 2024 -6- she submitted that the petitioners are the persons with criminal antecedents and there are incriminating materials to show the involvement of the petitioners. The petitioners' custodial interrogation is necessary and recovery is to be effected. If the petitioners are granted an order of pre-arrest bail, it would hamper with the investigation. Hence, the application may be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 94 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2020

(ix) Needless to mention, it would be well BAIL APPL. NO.1723 OF 2024 -17- within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioners even while the petitioners are on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].
Supreme Court of India Cites 74 - Cited by 15728 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next