Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.56 seconds)Faqir Chand vs Shri Ram Rattan Bhanot on 30 January, 1973
Dr. K Madan vs Smt. Krishnawati & Anr on 6 November, 1996
Union Of India And Ors vs Dev Raj Gupta And Ors on 23 October, 1990
18. Apart from the above decision of the Supreme Court, reference may also be made to Union of India & Ors. Vs. Dev Raj Gupta & Ors.,
where the Supreme Court in paragraph 17 of the Report held as follows:
Smt. A.N.Kapoor vs Smt. Pushpa Talwar on 31 January, 1992
25. However, by relying upon those very decisions, the Supreme came to an entirely opposite conclusion in A.N. Kapoor Vs. Pushpa Talwar, . In that case, the tenant therein was permitting the premises for being used by foreign students on a paying guest basis. In paragraph 10 of the
Report, the Supreme Court concluded that such user took the premises in question out of the ambit of the expression "premises let for residential purposes".
N.D.M.C. vs Sohan Lal Sachdev (Dead) Represented By ... on 9 February, 2000
39. Learned counsel for the landlord stated that there is a recent decision of the Supreme Court (dated 9th February, 2000) in the case of New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Sohan Lal Sachdev, II (2000) SLT 13 where the question which has arisen in this case has been considered by the Supreme Court.
Section 14 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Veera Rai vs S.P. Sachdeva on 30 May, 1984
1. By this judgment, I propose to decide two appeals filed under the
provisions of Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). These appeals are S.A.O. No. 240/1982 (Veera Rai Vs. S.P. Rao & Ors.) and S.A.O. No. 271/1982 (S.P. Rao Vs. Veera Rai). Both these appeals are directed against the order dated 4th May, 1982 passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal(hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in RCA No. 615/1981 and RCA No. 158/1979.
Section 39 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
R. Ramanujam vs Ajit Singh Thukral And Ors. on 28 April, 1978
24. Learned counsel for the tenant placed great reliance upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Shri R. Ramanujam Vs. Shri Ajit Singh Thukral & Ors., 1978 (2) RLR 41. In that decision, this Court expressed the view that running a lodging house would amount to utilising the premises for residential use. While coming to this conclusion, the learned Single Judge relied upon to certain decisions rendered by Court in England.
1