Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 135 in Bombay Police Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Raj Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Anr vs Mohan Lal And Ors on 17 May, 2012
[Vide State of Rajasthan vs.
Sohan Lal and Others, (2004) 5 SCC573]"
State Of Karnataka vs Hemareddy Alias Vemareddy And Anr on 27 January, 1981
16. It is also a settled legal position that in
acquittal appeals, the appellate Court is not
required to rewrite the judgment or to give fresh
reasonings, when the reasons assigned by the
Court below are found to be just and proper. Such
principle is laid down by the Apex Court in the
case of "STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. HEMAREDDY", AIR
1981, SC 1417, wherein it is held as under;
Ambalal Nandlal vs State Of Gujarat on 5 August, 2004
The said doctor has, in her cross-examination
accepted the suggestion that the injuries on the
body of the complainant could be by way of
vehicular accident. In the certificate, it is
nowhere stated that with what weapon the accused
had inflicted the injuries on the body of the
complainant. The evidence of the main complainant
has been scrutinised by the learned trial Judge.
It goes without saying that on the basis of the
catena of decision, more particularly, going
through the judgments of this court, on which,
reliance was placed by the learned trial Judge in
the case of Ambalal Nandlal v. State of Gujarat,
reported in 2004(3) GLH 691 and in the case of
Musaahemad Hajivali v. State of Gujarat reported
in 2005(1) GLH (UJ)-4, are pressed into service
by Mr. Barod learned advocate for the respondent-
accused and has submitted that the judgment does
not require any interference. No ingredients of
section 325, 323, 504 and 506(2) of IPC are made
out, and hence, this appeal deserves to be
dismissed. Mr Oza learned APP has taken this
Court through the detailed judgment of the trial
Court, however, finding recorded by the learned
trial Judge in the judgment will not permit this
Page 15 of 17
HC-NIC Page 15 of 17 Created On Sat Apr 02 02:48:43 IST 2016
R/CR.A/2162/2005 JUDGMENT
Court to take a different view then that taken by
the learned trial Judge. Even in the present
appeal, nothing is produced or pointed out to
rebut the conclusion of the trial Court.
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 4 July, 2006
In the case of
"M.S. NARAYANA MENON @ MANI VS. STATE OF KERALA &
ANR", (2006) 6 S.C.C. 39, the Apex Court has
narrated the powers of the High Court in appeal
against the order of acquittal. In para 54 of the
decision, the Apex Court has observed as under;