Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.57 seconds)

Committee Of Creditors Of Essar Steel ... vs Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors on 3 January, 2019

And, if the Adjudicating Authority would find on a given set of facts that the requisite parameters have not been kept in view, it may send the resolution plan back to the Committee of Creditors for resubmission after satisfying the parameters. Then, as observed in Maharashtra Seamless Ltd. (supra), there is no scope for the Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Authority to proceed on any equitable perception or to assess the resolution plan on the basis of quantitative analysis. Thus, the treatment of any debt or asset is essentially required to be left to the collective commercial wisdom of the financial creditors."
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 164 - Full Document

M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 December, 2019

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 78 of 2021 Page 5 of 10 She has also referred to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Embassy Property Developments Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and Others, [(2020) 13 SCC 308] to contend that once disconnection of the electricity connection took place on 12.09.2016, almost three years before the initiation of CIRP of the corporate debtor, leading to 'deemed termination' of the electricity connection, jurisdiction was not available under IBC to give direction for fresh connection in the resolution plan.
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 322 - V Ramasubramanian - Full Document
1   2 Next