Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.78 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Factories Act, 1948
The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
The Management Of Indian Cable Co., ... vs Its Workmen on 5 March, 1962
5. The decision under S. 19A of the Act not immune to review by this Court if there had been a violation of the principles governing the same. The pointing issue in the present case is as to whether the two units, namely, the press and the publication form one integral unit or they are independent and separate. If the position is the first one, the publication, alongwith the press, will come within the mischief of the Act. If the position is the latter one, the publication will go outside the Act. That it is the first respondent who should decide the matter is not being disputed before us. In Indian Cable Co. Ltd. v. Its Workmen (1962 - I LLJ 409), the Supreme Court opined that the question a branch or a department is in itself an industrial establishment within the meaning of S. 25G of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, is a mixed one of fact and law.
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Mines Act, 1952
Section 25G in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Associated Cement Companies ... vs Their Workmen on 11 September, 1959
As observed in the above decision, the real purpose of the test must be to find out the true relation between the parts, branches, units etc. and if in their true relation they constitute one integrated whole, then it must be held that the establishment is one. But, on the contrary, if they do not constitute one integrated whole, then each unit must be held to be independent and a separate one.
Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947
1