Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)
State vs . Rajni on 3 September, 2015 cites

Mr. Dharam Pal Mehra vs The Adm, Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 January, 2009

In a case titled as Satish Mehra Vs. Delhi Admn. & Anr. 1996 JCC 507 Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, it is held that "in a case where, there is no prospect of the case ending in conviction, the valuable time of the court should not be wasted for holding a trial only for the purpose of formally completing the procedure to pronounce the conclusion on the future date"
Central Information Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 390 - Full Document

Rattan Lal vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1964

10. In view of this rule, while deposing none of the prosecution witnesses has told that by what entry in the register no. II, they were patrolling in the particular area. In the present case also this provision has not been complied with by the prosecution witnesses. The relevant entries regarding the arrival and departure of the police officials has not been proved on record. It has been held in Rattan Lal Vs. State 1987 (2) Crimes 29 the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that;
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 3912 - Full Document
1   2 Next