Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Vithal Rao And Anr Etc vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer on 7 July, 2017
22. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vithal Rao case (cited supra) indicated the plus and minus factors while fixing the land value:-
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Mohabir Singh Etc. Etc on 21 November, 1995
18. The Supreme Court in State of Punjab and others v. Mohabir Singh and others [(1996) 1 SCC 609] indicated the evidentiary value of guideline rate in the following words:-
R. Sai Bharathi vs J. Jayalalitha & Ors on 24 November, 2003
19. The Supreme Court in R.Sai Bharathi v. J.Jayalalitha and others [(2004) 2 SCC 9] held that guideline value is not final but only a factor to be taken note of, which is prevailing in the area. The Supreme Court said:
Kasturi & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 12 November, 2002
21. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kasthuri v. State of Haryana [(2003) 1 SCC 354 indicated that existence of a developed land adjacent to, would not be a ground to value all the land in the area alike. The Supreme Court said :
The Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Bhupal Singh & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 1 April, 2015
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhupal Singh and others v. State of Haryana [(2015) 5 SCC 801] indicated that it is open to the Court to exercise the discretion within the permissible parameters after appreciating the evidence brought on record and applying the relevant legal principles.