Begum. Before narrating the facts culminating in the filing of the CM(Main), all the events have to be noted in some detail.
The late ... Nizar Ali Ayisha Begum had a son Amir Ali (petitioner in CM(Main)) and two daughters Mst. Zarina Begum and Mst. Mobina Begum. The petitioner
appellant.
This appeal really did not survive after 12.7.2006 when, in CM (Main)
68/2000 filed by two sons of the deceased-tenant Sant Singh ... Review Petition 398/06 was also filed to contend that
the CM (Main) was not maintainable and therefore the judgment
upholding the eviction order passed
KRBL to proceed for registration. Against the said
order NBRM filed CM (Main) 199 of 2000 in this Court. By an order dated ... proceed for registration. Against the said order KRBL
filed CM (Main) No. 403 of 2000 in this Court. By an interim order dated 24th July
matters numbered as FAO (OS) 141/2018, FAO
(OS) 142/2018, CM (Main) No 867/2018 CM (Main) 1376/2018 and
RFA 545/2017 ... applications under Order VII Rule
11 of the CPC , stated the CM (Main) 67/2018 which is pending before
this Court should be adjudicated first
stating that she had assailed the Order dated 25.4.2013 by
filing CM (Main) petition, which was registered as No.665/2013, as she
was under ... made an application, being
CM No.13333/2014, seeking a direction from the Court to de-list the
petition [CM(Main) No.665/2013
told the Appellants that he would be filing a CM (Main)
against the Order of the Executing Court, before this Court. The concerned
Advocate also ... gave a filing number of CM (Main), which he claimed to
have been filed. However, on checking the website of this Court, the
Appellants came
bank before this Court by way of a petition (CM (Main) No. 295/99) under Article 227 of the Constitution and the said petition ... 17th May, 2000. Against these orders, petitioners herein filed CM (Main) No. 321/2000 in this Court. In this petition the main grievance
Appellant informed the
present counsel that the appeal by way of CM(main)
will lie against the impugned order dated 08.05.2024
before ... same is within limitation.
4. That on 26.06.2024, the Appellant filed CM Main No.
2966 of 2024 before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
Appellant informed the
present counsel that the appeal by way of CM(main)
will lie against the impugned order dated 08.05.2024
before ... same is within limitation.
4. That on 26.06.2024, the Appellant filed CM Main No.
2966 of 2024 before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
entertain such application. The
petitioner assailed the said order vide CM (Main) wherein the
Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide its order dated ... application was dismissed vide
detailed order. The petitioner preferred a CM (Main) before Hon'ble
High Court and the proceedings remained stayed till
