2019 at 05:41:31 AM)
(2 of 15) [CMA-5233/2011]
compensation quantified and awarded by the learned Tribunal is
not adequate ... 2019 at 05:41:31 AM)
(3 of 15) [CMA-5233/2011]
4. The claim petitions were contested by respondents but no
reply was filed
Kothari , C.V.Karthikeyan
1/20
Judgment dt.24.06.2019 in CMA 3183 of 2008
Commissioner of Customs vs
Duraiappa and others ... judis.nic.in
2/20
Judgment dt.24.06.2019 in CMA 3183 of 2008
Commissioner of Customs vs
Duraiappa and others
JUDGMENT
(Judgment
Author: Dinesh Mehta
Bench: Dinesh Mehta
(1 of 30) [CMA-1398/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal ... 2019 at 10:09:43 PM)
(2 of 30) [CMA-1398/2019]
9. Shri Sen Kul Chorasi, Purbia Piao and Bagechi Sanstha,
Naiyon Ki Bagechi
SEETHARAMA MURTI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
CMA.NO.1303 of 2018
JUDGMENT
[per Hon'ble Sri Justice ... facts that lead the 1st defendant to file the present CMA before
this Court may be stated, in brief, as follows:
The plaintiffs instituted
Jaya
2.Shankar
3.Prakasam @ Govindasamy
4.Kumudha ...Respondents/petitioners
in CMA.No.873/2018
5.S.Veeramani .. Respondent in both the CMAs
M. Neelaveni ... Respondent in CMA.No.874/2018
Common Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173
of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award
carry bags, packing material, sign boards bearing the impugned
MSR,J
::2:: cma_1246_2018
trade name/trade mark/service mark consisting of the word ... enjoy the copyright therein. It contended that it applied
MSR,J
::3:: cma_1246_2018
for registration of the composite label containing the logo consisting
2019 at 08:52:36 PM)
(2 of 15) [CMA-1900/2004]
3. The husband alleged that since the beginning of the marriage, the
respondent ... 2019 at 08:52:36 PM)
(3 of 15) [CMA-1900/2004]
the respondent/wife did not want to live with the family
2019 at 11:24:13 PM)
(2 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
5. Smt. Parmeshwari Devi, Wife Of Shri ... 2019 at 11:24:13 PM)
(3 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
Natural Guardian Smt. Sahida Bano, Appellant No.6
----Appellants
Versus
1. Pawandeep Singh
Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
(1 of 14) [CMA-184/1991]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil ... 2019 at 08:24:04 PM)
(2 of 14) [CMA-184/1991]
of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 . The demand raised
2019 at 11:24:16 PM)
(2 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
5. Smt. Parmeshwari Devi, Wife Of Shri ... 2019 at 11:24:16 PM)
(3 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
Natural Guardian Smt. Sahida Bano, Appellant No.6
----Appellants
Versus
1. Pawandeep Singh
