miserably
failed to prove that the defendant no. 1 is covering the common gali
which was used by plaintiff and the other property owners ... small) on the front side, chabutara (projection), 1 bathroom built on a
plot of land measuring 40x16 has fallen in the share of Shri Rishi
feet common passage on the southern side of
the plot and eight feet wide gali/common passage on the northern side of
the plot ... feet common passage on the southern side of the plot and
eight feet wide gali/common passage on the northern side of the plot
plot no. 191, Nangli Sakrawati,
Najafgarh, accused alongwith his associate in furtherance of
their common intention dishonestly entered in the aforesaid
premises by breaking open
plot No.50, village
Mukundpur and that the defendants have filed their common
written statement considering the number of suit property as
plot ... parties to bear
their own cost of the application.
Announced in the open court
today i.e 03.02.2011 (M.K. Gupta)
Additional District Judge
Rohini
sale deed and sold only 100 Sq. Yds of the
plot MarkB in the site plan Ex. PW1/1 and thus adding ... alter his plan to open the window and door in the said
passage which itself shows that it is not common passage
but the portion
Bhanwar Singh purchased a plot
measuring 250 sq. yds. vide a sale deed dated 26.06.1971.
Subsequently they partitioned this plot in two equal shares ... also installed a
exhaust fan and windows in his property opening towards this common
gali, for which he has no right
flat on plot no. K15 Green Park, New Delhi, having two rooms,
kitchen, toilet, WC passage , open terrace. The open courtyard shown ... ABCD" in the site plan is meant for common use of plaintiff and
defendant no. 1. The building is stated
issues No. 1, 2 & 4 requires common discussion, hence,
they are taken up together. The onus to prove the issues ... said plot on the behest of defendant
No. 1 taking advantage of holidays from 13.08.2005 to 15.08.2005. The
defendant No. 1 broke open the lock
that appellant/plaintiff is not the owner of the
suit plot and the suit plot was encroached upon by the
appellant/plaintiff and illegal ... plaintiff
has no right, title or interest over the suit plot which is a common
public passage used by respondents/defendants and other residents
defendant) in respect
of plot admeasuring 225 sq. yards situated at 45, Arihant Nagar, Punjabi
Bagh, New Delhi (the suit plot). Vide judgment dated ... suit plot and it was directed
that the suit plot should be sold by the parties in the open market at best
available within
