Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2293 (3.74 seconds)

Sat Pal Kansal vs Estate Officer, on 17 January, 2014

redressed, left with no alternative, a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be called as the Act only ... under the Right to Information Act, 2005 , which he had already availed of, the complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Chand Thakur vs Sai Seeds & Pesticide & Anr. on 20 May, 2014

learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shimla, whereby his complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which he filed against the respondents ... Appellant- Ramesh Chand Thakur, filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, alleging that on 12.01.2011, he purchased
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narinder Kumar vs M/S Omaxe Limited & Anr. on 5 June, 2014

revision petitioner, who filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, has been closed. 2. Revision petitioner ... filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, complaining of deficiency in service, in the matter of allotment
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pratap Rai Mohan vs M/S Omaxe Limited & Anr. on 5 June, 2014

revision petitioner, who filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, has been closed. 2. Revision petitioner ... filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, complaining of deficiency in service, in the matter of allotment
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kala Thakur vs M/S Omaxe Limited & Anr. on 5 June, 2014

revision petitioner, who filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, has been closed. 2. Revision petitioner ... filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, complaining of deficiency in service, in the matter of allotment
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajinder Kumar & Anr. vs M/S Omaxe Limited & Anr. on 5 June, 2014

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solan, whereby evidence of the revision petitioners, who filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against ... closed. 2. Revision petitioners have filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, complaining of deficiency in service
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dishant Chhabra vs M/S Omaxe Limited & Anr. on 5 June, 2014

revision petitioner, who filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, has been closed. 2. Revision petitioner ... filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the respondents, complaining of deficiency in service, in the matter of allotment
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next