also been submitted that the compromise was actually never brought into effect and even after the compromise decree dated 07.01.1954, there is no proof ... basis of an illegal compromise entered into between the parties as mentioned in the compromise decree dated 07.01.1954.
32. A Sirdar could not agree
terms of the compromise.
5. On coming to know of this compromise Decree, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner, which was allowed ... Gaon Sabha or the State Government to the said compromise. If the compromise Decree had been passed without their knowledge, the proper remedy would have
before the same court that recorded the compromise and a fresh suit for setting aside a compromise decree is expressly barred under Order 23 Rule ... also covers a decree based on a fraudulent compromise hence, a challenge to a compromise decree on the ground that it was obtained by fraudulent
noticed above. The lower appellate court has essentially relied upon the compromise decree passed in Original Suit No. 204 of 1999 to observe that defendant ... Original Suit No. 204 of 1999, as well as the compromise decree passed therein has been relied upon by the lower appellate court to return
entered into a compromise on 11.1.2011. Ultimately, abovementioned suit was decided in terms of compromise dated 11.1.2011 vide judgment and decree dated 18.1.2011.
8. Feeling ... behest of the Court where the suit was filed and the compromise decree was passed. It is also submitted that till date no application
that the petitioners could not prove their claim based on the compromise decree between the parties, dated 21.10.1948.
9. The further revision filed ... petitioners were claiming 1/3rd share on the basis of compromise decree. Therefore, rejection of the claim made by Het Singh and confirmation of that
which Vinita Chaturvedi was tenant was vacated pursuant to a compromise decree passed in Case No. 46 of 2007 filed by the respondent-landlord against ... shop of Vinita Chaturvedi has recorded a finding that as per compromise decree dated 23.12.2011 in Case No. 46 of 2007, she was to vacate
counsel for the petitioner argues that on the basis of a compromise decree dated 7.11.1985 the petitioner had filed execution application. In the said execution ... counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the compromise decree a sale deed was executed in his favour on 17.2.1994 and, thus
nevertheless, it would be equal to and at par with a decree on compromise and will have the same binding effect and it is equivalent ... trial, however, it is as equal and on par with a decree on compromise and will have the same binding effect and conclusive just
petitioner/plaintiff. The family settlement was finally made part of a compromise decree in the judgment and order dated 16.01.2018 rendered by the learned trial ... also party to the aforesaid suit and the compromise decree. This document is also in the record before the learned courts below in regard
