While so, the Department of Labour and the Government intervened and initiated conciliation proceedings between the parties to bring about a settlement ... settlement could be reached between parties. On April 9, 1991, a Conciliation Failure Report was said to have been submitted to the Government
specific
case of the petitioner that 1st respondent has not attempted conciliation and
terminated the same in the manner known to law and therefore, without ... respondent submitted that the 1st
respondent initially attempted the conciliation between the petitioner and the
2nd respondent. When there was no consensus between the parties
respondent is expected to conduct a
conciliation proceedings either by the 1st respondent or seek the
assistance of any institution or centre providing alternate
dispute ... making a reference to such an
institution or centre, for conducting conciliation. If the
conciliation fails, under
Madras. It was also contended that the appellant originally approached the Conciliation Officer appointed by the Government of Tamil Nadu and the same was taken ... Bihar at Jamshedpur. The Assistant Commissioner of Labour at Jamshedpur also held conciliation proceedings, but, for the reasons best known to the appellant, he abandoned
Assistant Commissioner of Labour
(Conciliation), Sriperumbudur.
2.United Labour Federation,
C.J. Complex, 4th Floor,
149, Thambu Chetty Street,
Chennai ... with regard to the reference of the industrial dispute covered by the conciliation failure report bearing Ref.Na.Ka.No.Aa/1204/09, dated
when the orders of dismissal were made on May 13, 1991, conciliation proceedings pending before the Labour Welfare Officer as to the notice of strike ... orders of dismissal were made, the management ought to have approached the Conciliation Officer for permission under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes
Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act. W.W.2, the Conciliation Officer, who signed the settlement under section 12(3) of the Industrial ... appellant submitted that the settlement reached in the course of conciliation under section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act and the said settlement would
petition dated 5.9.1990 before the conciliation officer, by way of an Industrial Dispute, after a lapse of 5 years from alleged date of non-employment ... order dated 10.12.1990, the Conciliation officer has sent a failure report and consequently, the second respondent has filed I.D. No. 34 of 1991 under
earnings to its workmen. A settlement was reached in the course of conciliation on 18th November, 1980 under section. 12 (3) of the Industrial Disputes ... Central Government and hence the appropriate Government to appoint the Conciliation Officer is the Central Government and the third respondent, who is admittedly
aware and the third respondent has also not given notice regarding the conciliation. After several round of discussion on the said dispute, the third respondent ... respondent, the petitioner union was also a party to the conciliation proceedings held before the 3rd respondent and the petitioner union has deliberately refused
