Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.55 seconds)

Unknown vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October, 2012

open to every State to make provisions for consequential seniority in promotion, subject to certain conditions. Thus the consequential seniority on promotion against roster point ... automatic. Such consequential seniority was to be granted only if the State makes a provision for such consequential seniority on the basis of material
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Shukla vs Union Of India on 13 March, 2012

pendency of another OA No.308-CH-2010 in which consequential seniority of respondents No.4 & 5 as Inspectors is under challenge, during pendency ... point promotee getting the benefit of accelerated promotion would not get consequential seniority. As such, consequential seniority constituted additional benefit and, therefore, his seniority will
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs The Director General on 29 March, 2012

erroneous fixture of seniority to his disadvantage. That the competent quarters had erred in the matter of fixture of seniority would be apparent from ... blamed for either low placement in the seniority or for the consequential denial of promotion to him for as long as 14 years. As against
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next