Limitation Act.”
34. Another judgment which needs to be noticed is
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and others
judgment of a larger Bench of this Court reported in
Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Irrigation Deptt. , (2008) 7 SCC
169 [“Consolidated Engg.”]. It was, therefore ... Madhya Pradesh and argued that this
Court’s judgment in Consolidated Engg. (supra), being a judgment of
three learned judges, would prevail over the judgment
ratio of Western Builders has been upheld in
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises -vs- Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department, (2008) 7 SCC 169. The Three-
Judge Bench reiterated ... with regard to the A&C Act.
These passages from Consolidated Engineering are
instructive:-
23. At this stage it would be relevant to ascertain
State of Goa v. Western
Builders ( 2006) 6 SCC 239, Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ( 2008) 7 SCC 169, Coal ... Customs, Central Excise v. Punjab Fibres
Ltd. ( 2008) 3 SCC 73, Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ( supra), Commissioner of Customs
Limitation
Act would apply to tribunals."
Thereafter, after referring to Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises v. Irrigation Department [(2008) 7 SCC 169] , it
was held ... square with the observations of the three-Judge
Bench in Consolidated Engg. Enterprises [(2008) 7 SCC 169] .
In the latter case, this Court has unequivocally
learned single Judge of this Court in S. P. Consolidated Engineering Co. (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India . . In that case, the learned Judge observed ... view of the learned Judge in the case of S. P. Consolidated Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. (supra) that because an application under Section
placed on a three-Judge Bench decision of this Court in
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and Ors. , 2 which has
enunciated ... particular, of the
decision in the case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises (supra). According to the respondents, the
subject suit was barred by limitation
Civil WP 6694 of 2018.odt
11
( vi) Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ,
(2008) 7 SCC 169.
(vii) Kapil ... respondent,
has also relied upon the judgments in Mukri Gopalan; Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises and Kapil (supra) which are also relied upon
by Mr. Anand Deshpande
Shin-Etsu Chemicals v. Vindhya
Telelinks , 2009 RLR 36 (NSC); Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department 2008 (6) SCALE 748; R.B. Ramalingum ... Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. & Ors., AIR 2009 SC 3284; Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors. , ( 2008) 7 SCC 169
4
Debjyoti
Western Builders and
2008(7) SCC 169, in the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others , and submitted that
Section ... case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary,Irrigation Department and others , laid the
conditions for invoking section 14 and further held that
