Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Anuj Saxena And Another vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 15 April

present case would clearly show that the Petitioner society had played fraud upon the Government by deceiving the Government and thereby obtained the settlement order ... time, the Petitioner was granted settlement, have been taking steps for constructions of multistoried residential and commercial building in connivance with M/S Bhuyan Projects

stand taken in the matter. He is guilty of constructive fraud as he, in connivance with defendant No. 1 and other group Companies, has sought

Grey, C.J., in R. v. Duchess of Kingston that: " 'Fraud' is an extrinsic, collateral act, which vitiates the most solemn proceedings ... action to impeach a judgment, actual fraud must be shown; mere constructive fraud is not, at all events after long delay, sufficient ... but such

deception may not amount to fraud, fraud is anathema to all equitable principles and any affair tainted with fraud cannot be perpetuated or saved ... Kinch v. Walcott it has been held that: "... mere constructive fraud is not, at all events after long delay, sufficient but such a judgment

deception may not amount to fraud, fraud is anathema to all equitable principles and any affair tainted with fraud cannot be perpetuated or saved ... Kinch v. Walcott it has been held that: "... mere constructive fraud is not, at all events after long delay, sufficient but such a judgment

very suspect transactions were completely genuine. The doctrine of "constructive fraud" is also impliedly applicable in this case. The doctrine is a legal

very suspect transactions were completely genuine. The doctrine of "constructive fraud" is also impliedly applicable in this case. The doctrine is a legal

very suspect transactions were completely genuine. The doctrine of "constructive fraud" is also impliedly applicable in this case. The doctrine is a legal

very suspect transactions were completely genuine. The doctrine of "constructive fraud" is also impliedly applicable in this case. The doctrine is a legal