Search Results Page

Search Results

81 - 90 of 19157 (4.63 seconds)

Vikas Raj Singh vs Sunil Kumar Jain on 27 May, 2024

Secondly, on the ground that it is not covered by the definition of consumer as define under Sec.2(d) of CPA. We have considered ... Appellant contended that the Respondent herein does not fall within the definition of consumer as per Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Gita Patel vs M/S A.M.Services & Ors. on 3 November, 2023

judgement. Hence, the complainant does not come under the purview of definition of „consumer‟ as defined under the Act therefore this complaint is not maintainable ... consideration is whether the complainant comes under the purview of definition of „consumer‟ and this complaint filed by her is maintainable before this Commission
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   5 6 7 8 9   10 11 12 13 14 Next