earning profit, as such, did not fall under
the definition of 'consumer'. There was no cause of action with the
First Appeal ... question. Therefore, the Complainant did not fall within the
definition of 'consumer'.
7. OP No.4-Insurance Company in its written reply
conclusion that the appellants do not fall under the definition of ‘consumer’
as they leased the said flat premises to Shri Sunil Raman ... appellants on the
premise that they do not fall under the definition of ‘consumer’ for leasing
out the subject property for commercial purposes, falling within
purpose' would not take the purchaser out
of the definition of 'consumer' if the commercial use is by the
purchaser himself ... such proof, the appellants therein
cannot be excluded from the definition of 'consumer' under the
1986 Act.
40. In the facts
Complainants are Consumer as
per the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act or whether the present complaint falls
within the definition of "Commercial Purpose ... evidence must be appreciated.
20. As we have shown above, the definition of consumer has three parts. The significance
of deconstructing the definition into three
Complainants are Consumer as
per the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act or whether the present complaint falls
within the definition of "Commercial Purpose ... evidence must be appreciated.
20. As we have shown above, the definition of consumer has three parts. The significance
of deconstructing the definition into three
further argued that the complainant
did not fall within the definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1) of the
Act and that ... made out and the Complainant did not fall within the definition of
„consumer‟ and the proceedings initiated were without jurisdiction. He
asserted that
further argued that the complainant
did not fall within the definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1) of the
Act and that ... made out and the Complainant did not fall within the definition of
„consumer‟ and the proceedings initiated were without jurisdiction. He
asserted that
overdraft account
which itself shows that the Appellant falls within the definition of consumer as
defined under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 .
4. The Respondent ... consumer
for Commercial Purpose does not falls within the definition of Consumer unless
such service is availed by the consumer exclusively for the purpose
ground that the
appellants/complainants do not fall within the definition of
'consumer' under the Consumer Protection Act , are wholly
First Appeal ... able to
show, how he can qualify to come under the definition of
consumer under the Act when he has not given any
clarification about
contended that the Complainant does not fall
under the definition of „Consumer‟ defined under Section 2(1)(d) of
Consumer Protection ... self-employment to earn his livelihood would fall within the
definition of „consumer‟ under the Consumer Protection Act .
22. We deem it appropriate to refer
