Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party referred to the judgment of this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.159/2012 Anil Dutt vs. M/s Business ... doubt that the Complainant in the present complaint is a consumer. The judgment relied upon by the Opposite Party in Consumer Complaint No.159/2012
level, then in that month such consumer
Page 12 of 38
Judgment in Appeal No. 380 of 2019
will get benefit of lower wheeling charges ... rights of a particular consumer or the Appellant, it has
introduced wheeling charges based on voltage level on which the
consumer is connected for different
whether the present application for review of the
judgment dated 14.09.2020passed under the Consumer
Protection Act, 1986 can be entertained by this Commission ... present case
took place as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the
judgment was pronounced on 14.09.2020. As per the Consumer
Protection
2015 and allowed that
complaint. Xerox copy of judgment of District Consumer
Redressal Forum, Aurangabad placed on record on behalf of
applicant below ... serial no.13. The applicant also filed
copy of judgment of State Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, Mumbai, Bench of Aurangabad in appeal
No.507/2015
passed by the District Consumer Dispute
Redressal Forum, Deoghar (hereinafter to be referred as "Consumer
Forum, Deoghar") in Consumer Case No. 89/2012 ... private
respondents.
2. According to the petitioner, the impugned judgment dated
15.12.2017 passed by the Consumer Forum, Deoghar is bad in law
and the same
Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party referred to the judgment of this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.159/2012 Anil Dutt vs. M/s Business ... doubt that the Complainant in the present complaint is a consumer. The judgment relied upon by the Opposite Party in Consumer Complaint No.159/2012
deficiency of service. Such matters cannot be entertained by the Consumer Forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ."
10. In Bihar School Examination Board ... consumer'- complaint under Consumer Protection Act not maintainable against Board/University- Orders of Consumer Fora set aside."
11. From the above authoritative judgments
advocate for the complainant has submitted following
judgments.
a) Judgment of The Gujarat State Consumer Redressal Disputes
Commission No.255/2014 National ... Altafali Mansurali Sumrani
b) Judgment of The Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission in Appeal No.253/2014 National Ins. Co. Ltd.
Vs. Nazir Sadrudin
Hence, the complainant is
requesting for setting aside the judgment and order of District
Consumer Forum.
5. On the respective submissions between the parties following ... part of
opponent. Hence, the opponent supported the judgment of District
Consumer Forum.
7. The complainant has produced some payment receipts against
the payment made
view of the respective submissions of the parties & the
judgment of District Consumer Forum, following points arise for our
determination.
5 FA/58/2019 ... want
of fitness certificate.
15. It reveals from the judgment of District Consumer Forum that
the District Consumer Forum has also rightly concluded that
