violated, but also that,
even after the Contempt Case was filed on 29.06.2009,
construction of the building continued for nearly two years
thereafter till ... what
action the 2nd respondent took after the contempt case was filed on
29.06.2009 complaining of continued violation of the order of this
Court
declined to, and further ordered that the undertaking given by them shall continue till the repayment, irrespective of the understanding that was arrived at between ... that the contempt which is alleged against the respondents is a continuing contempt since the failure to repay the deposits as ordered is being continued
authority to punish summarily contempts of themselves and of their judges. The Government of India Act, 1935 , continued this power, authority and special summary jurisdiction ... court including the power to punish for contempt of itself" Article 225 has continued to the High Courts the jurisdiction and powers which they
preventing other advocates from presenting their cases, the proceedings for contempt were continued, firstly in CC No. 162 of 1996 and then ... respondent enhances and not reduces the guilt of contempt.
22. Not only the respondent has committed contempt on 27-2-1996 in the first Court
supra, no purpose will be served in still continuing the
contempt proceedings against the respondents. Accordingly,
C.C.No.48 of 2014 is closed.
There
writ petition, I do not find any valid grounds whatsoever to continue the contempt case and it is accordingly closed
K. Harinatha Reddy And Others vs B. Rama Rao And Others on 20 January, 2001
contention of the review petitioner that the issue of limitation in the contempt case touches the jurisdiction of the case is untenable. The petitioner ... Contempt Appeal dated 17-4-2002. In support of his contention that the review petitioner should be punished for contempt for continued inaction
schedule
premises, he is not willing to continue as his Counsel. This Court has
therefore adjourned the Contempt Case to enable the Contemnor to file ... avoid the contempt. The contemnor is
totally remorseless for his contumacious conduct. Far from purging the
contempt, he continued to show his defiance. Vexed with
Seeking to have respondents 1, 2, 4 to 9, punished under the Contempt of Courts Act , for wilful disobedience and gross violation of the orders ... Company Law Board, Additional Principal Bench, Chennai dated 18.07.2005, this contempt case is filed.
2. Facts, to the extent relevant, are that
