Commnr. Of Customs, Pune vs M/S. Dabhol Power Co. on 3 November, 2015
Bench: A.K. Sikri , Rohinton Fali Nariman
IN THE SUPREME COURT ... COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PUNE ... Appellant
VERSUS
M/S. DABHOL POWER CO. ... Respondent
O R D E R
Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, learned senior counsel appearing
Anil Shankar Dabhole vs The State Of Maharashtra on 30 April, 2026
ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.13 SECTION ... 2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Bombay]
ANIL SHANKAR DABHOLE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
IA No. 125268
Anil Shankar Dabhole vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 May, 2026
ITEM NO.803 COURT NO.14 SECTION ... 2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Bombay]
ANIL SHANKAR DABHOLE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
Date
Commnr. Of Customs, Pune vs M/S. Dabhol Power Co. on 4 August, 2015
Bench: A.K. Sikri , Rohinton Fali Nariman
ITEM NO.104 COURT ... 2004
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, PUNE Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/S. DABHOL POWER CO. Respondent(s)
Date : 04/08/2015 These appeals were called
Commnr. Of Customs, Pune vs M/S. Dabhol Power Co. on 27 April, 2015
Bench: A.K. Sikri , Rohinton Fali Nariman
ITEM NO.105 COURT ... 2004
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, PUNE Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/S. DABHOL POWER CO. Respondent(s)
Date : 27/04/2015 These appeals were called
Commnr. Of Customs, Pune vs M/S. Dabhol Power Co. on 6 October, 2015
Bench: A.K. Sikri , Rohinton Fali Nariman
ITEM NO.102 COURT ... 2004
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, PUNE Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/S. DABHOL POWER CO. Respondent(s)
Date : 06/10/2015 These appeals were called
Commnr. Of Customs, Pune vs M/S. Dabhol Power Co. on 20 April, 2015
Bench: A.K. Sikri , Rohinton Fali Nariman
ITEM NO.801 COURT ... 2004
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, PUNE Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/S. DABHOL POWER CO. Respondent(s)
Date : 20/04/2015 These appeals were called
maintained at reasonable
rate. In this regard, a brief reference to
the Dabhol power project and the Pragati II &
III Power Projects, which ... respondent has attached a lot of importance
to the revival of the Dabhol power project
and has constituted an Empowered Group of
Ministers for this
follows:
(1) Validity of the project and the contract known
as Dabhol Power Project; and
(2) the accountability of the State of Maharashtra
(respondent ... question i.e. validity of the
project and the contract known as Dabhol Power Project was
refused to the petitioners who had approached the Court
awarded
by the respondent for Pipeline Laying and Terminal Works for Dabhol
– Bangalore Pipeline Project.
4. According to the petitioner, the respondent had floated
