Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 223 (0.76 seconds)

Shri Manish Bachhil vs Union Of India on 7 August, 2015

enhanced by creating various posts like DC (Tele), Commandant (Tele) and DIG (Tele) in the cadre. The Recruitment Rules of these posts have already been ... ground that the applicant has accepted promotion as DC (Tele) under new Recruitment Rules 2012 and therefore, he has waived his right to seek
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Subhash Sahni vs Union Of India on 30 June, 2009

department by misreading the said Service Rules or such promotion given pursuant to judicial orders contrary to Service Rules cannot be a ground to claim ... based on Rules. We have clearly seen that the note appended to Schedule II of the Indian Revenue Service Recruitment Rules provides, inter alia, that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Subhash Sahni vs Union Of India on 30 June, 2009

department by misreading the said Service Rules or such promotion given pursuant to judicial orders contrary to Service Rules cannot be a ground to claim ... based on Rules. We have clearly seen that the note appended to Schedule II of the Indian Revenue Service Recruitment Rules provides, inter alia, that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Utpal Nath vs M/O Finance on 29 January, 2026

failed to consider and incorporate the official communication dated 06.09.2021 issued by DC-MSME, which reaffirmed the applicant's settled seniority position, while passing ... courts. Such selective application of rules and instructions is unfair, arbitrary, and cannot be sustained in law. 62. Significantly, DC-MSME, the sole competent authority
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dheer Singh vs Gnctd on 19 November, 2025

submits that in view of the provisions of Rule 43 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and FR 56, retirement can be withdrawn with permission ... with the provisions of Rule 43 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and also those of Rule 43 (6) of said rules which requires the notice
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharam Pal Singh vs M/O Home Affairs on 3 August, 2023

clause 9 of Recruitment Rules notified vide notification dated 15.04.2002 & 30.10.2013 for promotion to the post of AD (DC) as unconstitutional to the extent ... Assistant Director (DC), even the matter was taken up with the Department of Personnel and Training for relaxation in the rules. However, the same
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next