defence that he was prevented from attending
duty by Shri P. Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who
prevented him to sign the attendance register and also
brought
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
Page
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri
P.Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought ... surmises the Inquiry Officer held the
appellant guilty.
23. Mr.P.Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur, who was the complainant and
against whom appellant alleged bias refused
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the
attendance register and also brought
defence that he was
prevented from attending duty by Shri. P.
Venkateshwarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who
prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought
defence that he was
prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who
prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought
