examining the same quash
and set aside the impugned seniority list of
DCIOs/Tech drawn upto 13.12.2010.
(b) direct the respondents to draw a fresh ... post of Assistant Director
(Technical) from the date promotes to DCIO(Tech)
was promoted after two years service in the grade
of DCIO (Tech
defence that he was prevented from attending
duty by Shri P. Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who
prevented him to sign the attendance register and also
brought
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri P.
Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
Page
defence that he was prevented from attending duty by Shri
P.Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur who prevented him to sign the attendance
register and also brought ... surmises the Inquiry Officer held the
appellant guilty.
23. Mr.P.Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur, who was the complainant and
against whom appellant alleged bias refused
Chaitanya
Puri, Advs. for DIAL.
Mr. G. Pumthian Lal, Adv. for DCIO/IB.
Mr. K.C. Upadhyay, Regional Dy.
Commissioner, BCAS.
CORAM
ShriShri V. Ilangovanwas not present despite notice. The
respondent Shri Hariminder Singh, DCIO, IB waspresent in person.
4. The respondent submitted thatthe RTI application
hearing through video conferencing.
The respondent Ms. Geeta Narendra, CPIO and DCIO, FRRO (Foreigners Regional
Registration Officer) was present in person.
6. The appellant submitted
Paulus attended the hearing through video conferencing.
The respondent Smt. Geeta Narendra, DCIO, Intelligence Bureau was present in person.
4. The appellant submitted that
Asif Ayaz was not present despite notice. The respondent Smt. Geeta
Narendra, DCIO, IB was present in person.
5. The respondent submitted that
