expedient to refer to Sections 7 , 8 and 9 of the DD Act
which provide as under:-
"7. Civic survey of, and master plan ... into which Delhi may be divided. Section 2(k) of
the DD Act defines „zone‟ to mean any one of the divisions in which
Delhi
statutory character under
the provisions of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 (DD Act ) read
with the Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Nazul Land)
Rules ... Nazul lands within the meaning of Section 21
of the DD Act. The elements of the 1961 Scheme were engrafted
into the Nazul Rules
moment it is
presumed that section 53B of DD Act 1957 applies, still
action taken by MSEFC and resulting arbitration
proceedings were definitely within ... raised herein, is
barred by Section 3 of the Delhi Development Act (DD
Act), 1957?
6.B.iii. Whether present proceedings are not
maintainable being
Notification dated 28.01.2019 under Section 22(1) of the DD Act,
marked as Mark B (pages 31 to 35).
3. Kabza Karwahi dated 23.11.2020, marked ... noted that no
notice under Section 53B of the Delhi Development (DD) Act and
Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code ( CPC ) was served upon
Notification dated 28.01.2019 under Section 22(1) of the DD Act,
marked as Mark B (pages 31 to 35). Digitally signed
by ANURADHA
JINDAL
ANURADHA ... noted that no
notice under Section 53B of the Delhi Development (DD) Act and
Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code ( CPC ) was served upon
plaintiff has not served
the notice U/s 53 B of DD Act, 1957 which is mandatory.
It has been further submitted ... barred for non-service of notice
U/s 53 B, DD Act? OPD
2). Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties
Notification dated 28.01.2019 under Section 22(1) of the DD Act,
marked as Mark B (pages 31 to 35).
3. Kabza Karwahi dated 23.11.2020, marked ... noted that no
notice under Section 53B of the Delhi Development (DD) Act and
Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code ( CPC ) was served upon
disposal of defendant, DDA under Section 22 (1) of
the DD Act vide notification no.F.9(20)/78 L&B dated ... virtue of
notification U/s 22(1) of the DD Act and the answering
defendant is within its right to protect its land from
maintainable for want of notice U/s 53 B of
DD Act, 1958 which is mandatory before filing any suit
against the answering defendant; that ... suit is bad for want of notice U/s 53B,
DD Act? OPD
(2) Whether the original allottee Smt. Rama Sharma
got the allotment
maintainable for want of notice
U/s 53- B of DD Act, 1957 which is mandatory and
compulsory before filing the suit against ... want of statutory
notice U/s 53B of DD Act? (OPD)
(4) Whether the suit has not been properly valued
for the purpose of Court
