DDA and based on the compromise decree in the civil suit. Respondent
contended that DDA wrongfully denied him the benefit of Conversion Scheme
even when ... apply for conversion of the property. Dehors the
scheme of conversion, the respondent is not entitled to apply for
conversion of the property
documents, which were to be lodged with the DDA for the conversion of the
suit property from leasehold to freehold, were executed by the defendants ... DDA. It is incorrect to suggest that it was the understanding that Mr.
S.L Tejwani and Sh. Ashok Tejwani would get the conversion done
DDA
14. Mr. Sanjay Katyal, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent
No.1/DDA urged that Section 6 of the DDA Act is the fountainhead ... DDA.
17. In rebuttal, Mr. Ravi Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioner referred to the decision by the DDA whereby conversion of
lease
DDA
14. Mr. Sanjay Katyal, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent
No.1/DDA urged that Section 6 of the DDA Act is the fountainhead ... DDA.
17. In rebuttal, Mr. Ravi Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioner referred to the decision by the DDA whereby conversion of
lease
Balance
Conversion Charges' of Rs. 82,800/- and 'Interest on Balance
Conversion Charges' of Rs. 1,11,780/-, the respondent/DDA ... rent or balance conversion charges since the submission of the
conversion application. In the absence of any such demand, the
respondent/DDA cannot claim interest
DDA attained finality only on 12.04.2016, the
appellant company could take recourse to the policy circulars issued by
DDA, permitting restoration and conversion ... rejection of the appellant company's representation for
restoration and conversion by DDA via communication dated 21.10.2016
gave rise to a fresh cause
DDA and based on the
compromise decree in the civil suit. Respondent contended that
DDA wrongfully denied him the benefit of Conversion Scheme even
when ... apply for conversion of the
property. Dehors the scheme of conversion, the respondent is not
entitled to apply for conversion of the property
agreement
was never binding upon the DDA, even if the defendant had
applied to the DDA for conversion of the property from
Lease Hold ... DDA. Even then the DDA was not
under an obligation to transfer the suit property from Lease
Hold to Free Hold as DDA being
DDA. It is further
contended that the entire process was done by the plaintiff before
the DDA or any other Government authority for this conversion ... floor of the suit property demolished by citing the requirement of
DDA for conversion of the suit property from lease hold to
freehold but there
This is for the reason that Counsel for DDA had submitted that policy of
DDA for conversion property from lease hold to free hold ... show
cause notice and cancellation of lease by the DDA on 7.3.2001 and DDA had DDA
failed to take into account its own policy
