Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Union of India v. N. S.Rathnam [( 2015) 10 SCC 681], Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University [( 1989) 2 SCC 145] and Maharashtra Forest Guards

desirability of achieving a particular object." 90. In Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University18 , the Court holds that Article 14 , now well settled, forbids class

8925 of 2012 -: 13 :- of India [AIR 1977 SC 1623]; Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University and another [AIR 1989 SC 903] W.B. Hosiery Association

2018 19 the object sought to be achieved." Again in Deepak Sibal and others v. Punjab University and another

Thomas and others [AIR 1976 SC 490] and Deepak Sibal and another v. Punjab University and another [(1989) 2 SCC 145]. In the light

Thomas and others [ AIR 1976 SC 490] and Deepak Sibal and another v. Punjab University and aother [(1980) 2 SCC 145]. 9.The object

Nalla Raja Reddy & Others [AIR 1967 SC 1458] and Deepak Sibal & Another v. Punjab University & Another ... bear a nexus with the object sought to be achieved. In Deepak Sibal's case (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered

Nalla Raja Reddy & Others [AIR 1967 SC 1458] and Deepak Sibal & Another v. Punjab University & Another ... bear a nexus with the object sought to be achieved. In Deepak Sibal's case (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered

Nalla Raja Reddy & Others [AIR 1967 SC 1458] and Deepak Sibal & Another v. Punjab University & Another ... bear a nexus with the object sought to be achieved. In Deepak Sibal's case (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered

Nalla Raja Reddy & Others [AIR 1967 SC 1458] and Deepak Sibal & Another v. Punjab University & Another ... bear a nexus with the object sought to be achieved. In Deepak Sibal's case (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered