appropriate writ, order or direction, the
respondent be directed to demarcate the land in
question with the Police aid.
(Downloaded on 20/04/2023 ... Bichhwal on 06.10.2015. The petitioner intended to get
the land in dispute demarcated in light of the Circular dated
12.04.2001 (Annex.5). In the said
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
said
representation (Annex.1) to the competent authority to re-
demarcate the land after making an inquiry into the matter.
5. The petitioners also received ... respondents visited the
site on 06.04.2021 and noticed errors and recommended for
demarcation of the land but the competent authority overlooked
the said recommendation
