under Order
VIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC for demarking
Ex.P51 and Ex.P53.
2. Heard learned counsel ... plaintiff, hence it is not permissible for the
petitioner/plaintiff to seek demarking of the documents
under Order XIII Rule 3 of CPC . Further, learned
Order XIII, Rule 3 and Section 151 of C.P.C. to demark the
document of photostat copy of an unregistered partition deed dated ... noted above was filed
by the plaintiff to demark Ex.B13 on the grounds that the document was
marked in the absence
filed I.A.No.52 of
2023 in the suit seeking to demark Ex.A.5 i.e., unregistered Development
Agreement, dated 07.08.2013. On hearing ... would be a part of Court record and it cannot
be demarked. Therefore, he prayed to set aside the docket order, dated
filed I.A.No.52 of
2023 in the suit seeking to demark Ex.A.5 i.e., unregistered Development
Agreement, dated 07.08.2013. On hearing ... would be a part of Court record and it cannot
be demarked. Therefore, he prayed to set aside the docket order, dated
learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Sangareddy for
demarking the document marked as Ex.A15.
2. The brief facts of the case that ... defendant No.1 filed
I.A.No.458 of 2024 for demarking Exs.A15 and A16 stating that on 13.02.2024,
all of a sudden
with regard to the said document
the moving of this application to demark the Ex.B1 is not at
all maintainable because already moved ... impression that the document was
impounded and so it can be demarked as per the decision of this
filed an application in E.A.No.249 of
2017 seeking to demark document - Ex.A.13 and permit her
to raise objection regarding admissibility ... marked and which is under-
stamped, it is not a ground to demark the document. The
Court is always empowered to collect the stamp duty
objection raised by the defendants, even after marking of the
document, demarked the agreement of sale, which is marked as
exhibit A1.
7. Aggrieved ... decision of the trial Court in demarking exhibit
A1, the plaintiff filed this revision contending that the suit itself
under Order 13
Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure to demark Ex.B-5
document dated 30.6.2011, was allowed.
2) The contention ... deficit stamp duty. Hence, the document marked as Ex.B5 be
demarked.
3) The petitioner/defendant opposed the petition stating
that, the District Registrar
Code of Civil Procedure
seeking the Court to reject and demark Exs.B15 and B46
and make an endorsement on the said documents that ... fraudulent manner. Therefore the said documents are liable
to be demarked.
3. The respondents therein filed counter opposing the
petition stating that already the documents
