been elaborately discussed by this court in Union of India v. Dharmendra
Textile Processors [2008] 13 SCC 369 [306 ITR 277] and CIT v. Atul ... Apex Court in UOI v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR
277 (SC), a decision by its larger bench, held its earlier decision in Dilip
Union
of India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC); K.P.
Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A. Balasubramaniam
Union of India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR
277 (SC); K.P. Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A.
Balasubramaniam
Union of India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC); K.P.
Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A. Balasubramaniam
Union of India v. Dharmendra Textile
Processors [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC); K.P. Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251
ITR 99 (SC); B.A. Balasubramaniam
dispelled by the larger bench decision by the Apex Court in
Dharmendra Textile Processors v. UoI [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC). Now, this does
Union of India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR
277 (SC); K.P. Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A.
Balasubramaniam
Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC); K.P.
Madhusudhanan vs. CIT [2001] 251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros
judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra Textile
Processors 306 ITR 277 and Atul Mohan Bindal
decision in a
central excise case in Union of India y. Dharmendra Textile
Processor [2008] 306 ITR 277 (SC) pointing out that the finality
