Capt. Randhir Singh Dhull vs S. D. Bhambri & Others on 2 March, 1981
Equivalent citations ... Islam , R.S. Pathak , O. Chinnappa Reddy
PETITIONER:
(EX) CAPT. RANDHIR SINGH DHULL
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
S. D. BHAMBRI & OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Vinay Dhull vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 18 August, 2018
Author: Ritu Bahri
Bench: Ritu Bahri ... CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3543 of 2017
Date of decision : 18.08.2018
Vinay Dhull ...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
CORAM
filing CWP No.13331 of 2008, titled as 'Shingara
Singh Dhull & others Vs. State of Haryana & others ', claiming therein
revised ... petitioners. He further contends that the
judgment in Shingara Singh Dhull 's case (supra) since has only relied upon
the judgment
Community Centre, Preet Vihar,
Delhi 110092. ...Applicant
(By Advocate : Shri Brijender Singh Dhull)
Versus
Central Board of Secondary Education
Through its Secretary,
Community Centre,
Preet ... which was one of the requirement to
apply.
3. Mr. Brijender Singh Dhull, learned counsel for the
applicant submitted that in accordance with the consolidated
earlier decision of this Court in Ex. Capt. Randhir Singh Dhull v. S.D. Bhambri and Ors. (1981)3 SCC 55 and the clarification ... question was not actually decided. On the other hand, in R.S. Dhull v. S.D. Bhambri , (1981)3 SCC 55, referring to Rule
Sharma,
S. P. Arora, Rajesh Arora, Vikas Kuthiala, Virender Kumar,
J. P. Dhull, Rakesh Nagpal, Rajesh Nain, R. S. Randhawa,
Nihal S. Choudhary, Suresh Kumar
General, Haryana.
Mr. R. K. Malik, Senior Advocate, assisted by
Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate, for the intervenors.
Arun Monga, J.
Grievance of the petitioners, general
Haryana Public Service Commission ..... RESPONDENTS
CWP No. 10848 of 2012
Sunil Dhull .... PETITIONERS
Vs.
State of Haryana ..... RESPONDENT
CWP No. 12111 of 2012
Jai Bhagwan
Khetarpal, Advocate
for the petitioner in CWP-21591-2020.
Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate and
Mr. Pardeep Dhull, Advocate
for the petitioners
Maanipur, Advocate
for respondents No. 3 to 5.
Mr. J.P.Dhull, Advocate
for respondent No.6 in CWP No. 17012 of 2012.
****
1.Whether
