taken any particular training for collecting the blood
samples for DNA test. She has admitted that there can be
::: Downloaded on - 03/06/2023 ... genetic and technical error while taking the blood sample
for DNA profiling.
.
44. PW-22 Dr. Anita Sharma had collected the
blood samples of accused
taken any particular training for collecting the blood
samples for DNA test. She has admitted that there can be
::: Downloaded on - 03/06/2023 ... genetic and technical error while taking the blood sample
for DNA profiling.
.
44. PW-22 Dr. Anita Sharma had collected the
blood samples of accused
Analysis. They were
necessary for DNA report. According to him, the appellant was
potent. The identification form for DNA samples is produced ... samples were preserved in her office. Their office had
received the samples of the appellant and the victim under one
covering letter and the sample
cannot be the inference that can be
drawn due to a DNA sample coming in favour
of the petitioner. Even otherwise, the DNA
sample report ... also be confirmed by way of evidence. Mere
production of DNA sample report before this
Court would not mean that it has to be taken
Investigating
Agency as to how the samples were collected, who carried the
samples, where samples were preserved in the Forensic Science
Laboratory, it cannot ... while locating,
collecting, and preserving DNA evidence can be
contaminated when DNA from another source
gets mixed with DNA relevant to the case. This
Investigating
Agency as to how the samples were collected, who carried the
samples, where samples were preserved in the Forensic Science
Laboratory, it cannot ... while locating,
collecting, and preserving DNA evidence can be
contaminated when DNA from another source
gets mixed with DNA relevant to the case. This
should not have been considered at all.
Further, the DNA report matches with the DNA sample of
accused No.1. That means accused ... DNA report. We
find that this reliance is proper. PW-9 Dr. Shailesh Devkar is the
doctor who has taken the DNA samples
Section 173 (8) of
Cr.P.C seeking permission to take DNA sample of the respondent was rejected.
Brief facts giving rise to this revision ... prosecutrix, therefore, DNA
test of the respondent is required in the matter and for which permission to take
DNA sample should be given. The impugned
analysis as
also the DNA report and the FSL report. The said DNA report
prepared by an expert revealed samples of “viscera” (semen ... refer to “Guidelines for collection, storage
and transportation of Crime Scene DNA samples For Investigating
Officers- Central Forensic Science Laboratory Directorate Of
Forensic Sciences Services
swab of the
victim had not been subjected to DNA profiling with the DNA sample of the
appellant for the purpose of proving that
