Ofcer received DNA report of
the appellant wherein it was mentioned that the DNA of the appellant
was matched with the DNA profle ... DNA examination including the appellant. The
appellant was referred to DNA examination on 23.6.2010. Thereafter
again on 30.6.2010 he was referred for drawing blood samples
investigation, the competent authorities of
Requesting State found finger prints and DNA samples of FC
Digitally signed
AKASH by AKASH JAIN
Date:
JAIN ... body), was
mixed from multiple sources. Sources of the mixed DNA are
DNA samples taken from items found inside the FC's
Digitally signed
parcels from Biological Division for DNA profiling
examination. He deposed about the result of examination of
articles and samples he received from the investigating ... officer
which are as under:-
―Result of Exam:- 1. DNA was extracted from the blood
sample detected
Case No.DNA-
562/14 and DNA profile of blood sample of Mahesh Vasant
Chilwante are identical and from one and same source of
male ... DNA profile of the
prosecutrix and another one matched the DNA profile of
PW-1. The result of DNA analysis and that of the DNA
Section 53 of Cr.P.C. and
difference between the DNA profile and DNA sample and
uses of DNA profile and elaborately discussed the same ... must also
21
be clarified that a "DNA profile" is different from a DNA
sample which can be obtained from bodily substances
doctors admitted
that they did not collect the blood or DNA sample from the appellant.
She submits that this is a fit case where ... absolutely dented. if the sampling is proper and if there is no
evidence of tampering of samples, DNA Test report is to be
accepted. DNA
defendants. Since the plaintiff had refused to give the DNA
sample, the view taken was that the Court cannot force the
plaintiff to provide DNA ... further evidence to be adduced by the
plaintiff (by providing DNA sample), need not be ordered by
Page 12 of 15
the Court
SFSL, Junga qua
DNA Profiling, wherein admittedly DNA of the prosecutrix has been
opined to be matched with the DNA of the accused, but since ... DNA profile obtained from Exhibit-7a
(underwear, Neha) matches completely with the
DNA profile obtained from Exhibit-10a(blood sample
on FTA card, Sanjeev Kumar
also sent to Forensic Lab for Chemical Analysis and DNA sample was
collected from the respondent and the victim child and were sent for medical ... same was also sent to the Forensic Lab and
DNA samples were also taken from the respondent and the victim child for DNA
test
DNA profile could not be generated from the bone which was necessary
to compare with that of DNA samples of the complainant and his wife ... because
the DNA profile could not be generated from the bone which was necessary
to compare with that of DNA samples of the complainant
