office subject to the pleasure of the
Government. If the Government is the
Appointing Authority for the Appellant, the
pleasure doctrine will apply fully ... hold office during the 'pleasure' of the
Governor. Thus, there is constitutional sanction for
'pleasure doctrine' in India
Ramandeep Singh vs Union Of India And Ors on 17 January, 2018
CWP No. 16978
pleasure doctrine and took note of the fact that Article 310 (1)
provides a constitutional sanction to the doctrine of pleasure. Unlike
in the United ... case of dismissal while invoking doctrine
of pleasure, the Hon‟ble Apex Court discussed the pleasure doctrine
and the case the various judgments
Supreme Court held that the pleasure doctrine incorporated in Article 310 as also the fetters imposed on its exercise by Article 311 (2) are designed ... 1957. But even in respect of other civil servants also the pleasure doctrine has not been incorporated in absolute terms as it is made subject
whether appointment to an office is based on the 'pleasure doctrine' are:
::: Downloaded on - 22/11/2018 23:00:30 :::HCHP ... appointed by the State in
exercise of its power of 'doctrine of pleasure', it is not necessary that such
an appointee should continue
pleasure of the President or the Governor, as the case may
be, under Article 310 of the Constitution. However, the
pleasure doctrine under Article ... rank except in accordance with Article 311(2). The above
doctrine of pleasure is invoked by the Government in the
public interest after a Government
some
years preceding his compulsory retirement. This power
based on the pleasure doctrine of the sovereign should not
be used for collateral purpose. The Supreme
some years preceding his compulsory retirement. This
power based on the pleasure doctrine of the sovereign
should not be used for collateral purpose. The Supreme
attains the age of 65 years whichever is earlier
subject to doctrine of pleasure. The date of birth of the Vice
Chancellor Prof. (Dr.) Sukhpal ... appointed by the Chancellor on the principle of
"the doctrine of pleasure" upon the
recommendations of a Search Committee and after
obtaining
some years preceding
his compulsory retirement. This power based on the pleasure doctrine
of the sovereign should not be used for collateral purpose. The
Supreme
