same
was dismissed only on the ground that the complainant being dominus litis
cannot be compelled to implead any party in her complaint against whom ... Revision Petition No.34 of 2022 6
observing that complaint is dominus litis and the complainant cannot be
compelled to implead any person
Others (2019 KHC 6689 : AIR 2019 SC 3577) plaintiff is the dominus litis and
hence the plaintiff cannot be forced to add parties against whom ... held that the
plaintiffs are the dominus litis and hence unless the Court suo motu directs to join any
other person not party
applicant i.e. Shri Munish Aggarwal that
complainant is dominus litis of his consumer complaint and
M/s. Pacific Construction and Management is not necessary ... consumer complaint is decided accordingly.
It is true that complainant is dominus litis of his consumer
complaint but it is well settled law that concept
society and
managing the affairs. They contended
that the complainants are dominus litis and without their consent third parties
should not be impleaded
against Insurance company. It is well settled law
that complainant is dominus litis of his matter. State
Commission is of the opinion that Insurance contract
courts, it would be open to the litigant who is the
dominus litis to have his forum conveniens. Further the expression "cause of action ... Oudh it would be open to the litigant who is the dominus
litis to have his forum conveniens. The litigant has the right
impleadment of parties is that
plaintiff in a suit being dominus litis may chose the person against
whom he wishes to litigate and cannot
Supreme Court has stated that the plaintiff is dominus litis and
is entitled to institute his suit in any forum which the law allows
been reiterated that the complainant, being dominus litis, is
ordinarily entitled to choose the parties against whom he seeks relief, so
long as such choice
consumer complaint
and it is well settled law that complainant is dominus litis of
his own consumer complaint. State Commission is of the
opinion that
