Civil Procedure Code.
(ii) The principle that the plaintiff is dominus litis and thus the
petitioner could not have joined as a party ... learned trial Judge had
overlooked that respondent no.1 (plaintiff) was dominus litis and the
petitioner in the facts of the case could not have
depth into the matter and held that the maxim "dominus litis"
means the plaintiff is the master of suit. It was further observed ... that the
rule of dominus litis is subject to the powers of the Court under Order 1,
Rule 10(2) of the Code inasmuch
impleadment of parties that the plaintiff in a suit being
dominus litis may choose the persons against whom he is to litigate and cannot ... impleadment of parties is that the
plaintiff in a suit, being dominus litis, may choose the persons against
whom he wishes to litigate and cannot
party. According to the petitioner, the plaintiff is the Dominus Litis and he alone is entitled to seek the relief he wants and to choose ... proper and necessary party, the theory that the Plaintiff is the dominus litis is not always an absolute rule and the Court is required
learned counsel for the petitioners,
submitted that the plaintiffs are the dominus litis. In 2013,
defendant no.1 clandestinely recorded the suit land ... Division Bench of this
Court held that the maxim "dominus litis" means the plaintiff is the
master of suit. It was further held
proceedings are instituted. In
a civil proceeding, the plaintiff is the dominus litis but if more than one
court has jurisdiction, court can determine which
tribunals for the redressal of his grievance and the
plaintiff being dominus litis has the option of suing in one of the
several courts having
jurisdiction under the Code
to try the suit, the plaintiff as dominus litis has a right to choose
the Court and the defendant cannot demand
jurisdiction under the Code
to try the suit, the plaintiff as dominus litis has a right to choose
the Court and the defendant cannot demand
jurisdiction under the Code
to try the suit, the plaintiff as dominus litis has a right to choose
the Court and the defendant cannot demand
