Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 157 (1.75 seconds)

Madhavadhara Vuda Colony vs Apsrtc Reported In 2001 (5) Alt 180. ... on 5 December, 2008

charges levelled against the employee in the departmental proceedings and the criminal proceedings are grounded on the same set of facts, charges, circumstances and evidence ... instigation of CBI and the CBI itself sent the draft charges to the department and the department simply adopted the same. According to the respondents
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.Ramasamy vs / on 4 October, 2017

head of Cable Charges, unauthorizedly utilizing Nellore Branch, Credit advice No.42, dated 26.05.1993 being the commission of Demand Draft for Rs.40 Indian Bank ... debiting cable charges account for Rs.30,610/-. The said debit voucher is marked as Ex.P70. After debiting the cable charges

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

judis Crl.A.No.22 of 2013 Demand draft for Rs.1,50,000/- both demand drafts were handed over to A.Jayasankar ... attracts both charges. 15. According to the Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/C.B.I, the prosecution has proved the charges against the accused
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs /

error in the order granting sanction to prosecute and error in framing charges. 11. According to the Learned Counsel for the appellant, the first charge ... accused to purchase demand draft in favour of M/s.Cony Bio Health vide demand draft No.101369. In absence of proof that, Meppedu Branch

State Of M.P vs Rameshwar & Ors on 6 April, 2009

loans in contravention of the Bank Rules and issued the cheque/drafts of such loans to the applicants directly who withdrew the amount without purchasing ... Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Indian Penal code. Similar charges were framed against the other respondents. 22. Mr. Tankha submitted that from
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 95 - A Kabir - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next