State conceded before the High Court that there was a
drafting error in the Government Order and so, it did not
press its case that
appearing on behalf of the Corporation submitted
that there was a drafting error in rule 10 (a), and as a
matter of interpretation the Court
provisions contained in the said draft
Standing Orders and made several changes in them. The draft
Standing Orders with the changes made by the Certifying ... Appellate Authority that the Certifying Officer
was in error in making modifications in the draft Standing
Orders submitted to him for his certification
sons. But there was no evidence to show that the draft was
ever approved by the testatrix or that the will was fully
read ... duly and
validly executed.
Held further, that the trial court was in error in holding
that the proof of signature in the instant case could
Sale-proceeds through British Indian Banks through
Drafts:
Rs, 4,40,878
(iii) Sale proceeds collected by collecting cheques on
British Indian Banks and Hundis ... Range. The Appellate Authority held that the Income-tax
Officer was in error in not excluding items (i) and (iii)
respectively from computation
constituency is ready, the registration officer shall
publish it in draft by making a copy thereof available for
inspection and displaying a notice in form ... correct any
clerical or printing errors or other inaccuracies
subsequently discovered in the roll. He then publishes the
roll together with the list
modify the scheme". The appellant's objections to the draft
scheme in question were heard by the Legal Remembrance,
appointed by the State ... empower him to cancel the draft scheme in
its entirety. He, therefore, heard the arguments addressed
on behalf of the appellant and approved the scheme
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 3 March, 1966
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi & Others vs The State Of Bihar(And Connected ... on 23 April
The State Of Punjab vs Sodhi Sukhdev Singh on 15 November, 1960
Equivalent citations: 1961