hearing of the case.
(iv) Review is not maintainable unless the material error,
manifest on the face of the order, undermines its soundness
or results ... ground for review.
(vii) The error apparent on the face of the record should not
be an error which has to be fished
2014
COMMON ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
Draft amendment allowed.
In all these appeals the appellant - Revenue has challenged the
respective ... facts and circumstances of the case, the
Tribunal has committed substantial error of law in extending stay of
recovery from the respondent beyond period
2014
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
1.00. Draft Amendment is allowed.
2.00. Heard Mr.R.J. Oza, learned senior advocate ... facts and circumstances of the case, the
Tribunal has committed substantial error of law in allowing
appeal of the respondent and thereby exonerating the
respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise ... vs Vishal Fabrics Private ... on 17 July, 2014
Author: M.R
Sadevant Manilal Brahmbhatt vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 24 April, 2014
Author: K
Saurashtra Cricket Association vs Income Tax Officer on 17 February, 2014
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi
Surya Veersinh Bhular vs Rupalee Do Rashmikant C Patel on 24 September, 2014
Bench: M
The C.I.T vs Shri Harish Popatlal Prajapati on 9 December, 2014
Bench: Ks
H R Iyer vs State Of Gujarat & on 22 April, 2014
Author: K.J
SHAH)
Page 1 of 6
O/TAXAP/611/2014 JUDGMENT
Draft Amendment is allowed.
1.00. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the
impugned order passed ... facts and circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal has committed substantial
error of law in granting extension of stay beyond
365 days by ignoring specific
