expeditious disposal of the application for police help made in the
execution proceedings.
Before the petitioner's plea can be taken up, the rank ... ensure that the execution case and the application therein, being
Ejectment Execution Case No.2017 of 2005 and Misc. Case
Bench at
the Presidency Small Causes Court at Calcutta to bring ejectment
execution case no.109 of 2009 to a logical conclusion upon
disposing
limited scope of the petition is for the transfer of
Ejectment Execution Case No.137 of 1984 from the City Civil Court
to the Presidency ... that the decree-
holders do not stand in the way of the execution proceedings being
transferred to the Presidency Small Causes Court. However, the
decree
petitioners seek a direction for the
expeditious conclusion of their execution
proceedings.
Since the execution case is pending from ... Judge, Small Causes Court at
Calcutta to ensure that Ejectment Execution
Case No.48 of 2014 is brought to a logical end in
the next
order by
which the executing Court has refused to adjourn the
execution proceedings despite a previous challenge to an
order by which the petitioners ... been made out, let no further
steps be taken in Ejectment Execution Case No.136 of
2016 pending before the IV Bench, Small Causes Court
petitioners seek a direction for the
expeditious conclusion of their execution
proceedings.
Since the execution case is pending from ... Judge, Small Causes Court at
Calcutta to ensure that Ejectment Execution Case
No.49 of 2014 is brought to a logical end in the
next
Civil Judge, Junior Division, 4th Court at Sealdah to bring
2
Ejectment Execution Case no. 2 of 2016 to its logical
conclusion as expeditiously
petitioner was that the opposite parties had obtained a stay in the
execution proceedings without complying with the condition
imposed by the first appellate court ... Junior Division), 3rd Additional Court at Alipore to expeditiously
dispose of Ejectment Execution Case No.5 of 2016 and without
affording any adjournment
been submitted by the Registrar (Judicial Service)
indicating that the relevant Ejectment Execution Case No.217 of
2005 was taken up by the 5th Bench
