order passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) dated 4.5.2012 in Execution Case No. 53 of 1980 rejecting the application of the petitioner under Order ... execution proceedings registered as Execution Case No. 53 of 1980.
5. It appears that during the execution proceedings orders were passed for ejectment
Constitution, the petitioner wants expeditious disposal of the execution proceedings being Execution Case No. 2 of 2009 arising out of judgment and decree passed ... Judge, Small Causes Court for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire property
deserved ejectment forthwith. Thus, the Authority passed a final order under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code directing not only ejectment ... Class/Tehsildar further imposed Rs. 4,000/- as a cost for execution of the order.
8. Against the order passed by the Authority under Section
property and therefore, can resist possession and a suit for ejectment therefore, would not lie.
In support of his argument learned counsel for the petitioner ... tenant would change in the event of an execution of an agreement of sale, an execution of an agreement of sale is required
against the judgment and decree for recovery of arrears of and rent ejectment passed by the Judge, Small Causes on 15th ... premises, namely, Mr. Rajendra Kumar Garg and the present petitioner with the execution of the rent agreement on 12th November, 1982 for a period
holding the petitioner to be in unauthorized and directing his ejectment from the land in question.
4. The petitioner preferred recall application as admittedly ... Magistrate, thereafter passed an order dated 26/27.10.2007 directing for execution of the order dated 23.11.2005.
6. From the order-sheet it transpires
Mahmood Hussain vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 23 February, 2018
Bench
Amit Gupta vs Gulab Chandra Kanodia on 15 May, 2023
Author: Ajit Kumar
Bench: Ajit
secured assets for any term except one year from the date of execution of the document. Admittedly, the document being relied upon by the petitioner ... present case, the opposite party actively prosecuted the suit for ejectment filed by him. Therefore, it cannot be accepted that the notice has been waived
Laxmi Kant & Others vs Smt. Ganga Devi on 22 May, 2018
Author: Sudhir Agarwal
