application
under Sec.47 of C.P.C. to dismiss the execution petition. Even before
numbering the same, the Executing Court has rejected the application ... proceedings in the Execution Petition.
4.The learned counsel for respondent raised objections stating that the suit
for ejectment was filed in the year
proceedings in the
Execution Petition.
4.The learned counsel for respondent raised objections stating that the suit
for ejectment was filed in the year
Whether the plaintiff/respondent is entitled to file the
suit for ejectment of the appellant in the absence of valid
notice under Section ... notice issued
by the landlord is valid, and the suit for ejectment is legally maintainable.
Consequently, the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed
clear that the entire facts reveal that in original proceedings in
Ejectment suit in E.S.No.75 of 1990, the revision petitioner / defendant /
tenant ... properly intimated to the land lord. So, the Execution
application was dismissed for default in the year 2014 itself
before this Court to set aside the Ejectment suit No. 32 of
1986 and the same was dismissed. Against the dismissal order ... petitioner filed E.A 4 of 2022 praying to appoint advocate commissioner
Execution Court finally held that as per Ex.B1 sale deed
findings of pending suit is prevail over the execution order.
Thereafter, the execution E.P was terminated on 21.11.2016 against the
termination ... ejectment in the year 1990 in O.S No. 16 of 1999 against the original
owner Mohan and the said Mohan contested the ejectment suit
Vasudevan vs S.Velayudham (Died) ... 1St on 8 July, 2025
Author: T.V. Thamilselvi
Bench
basis of
prior possession. It was not a summary suit for ejectment filed
under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Thus, plaintiff
could ... that denial for want of knowledge is no denial at
all. The execution of the sale deed was not specifically denied in the
written statement
Balusamy (Died) vs S. Kannappan (Died) on 20 March, 2025
Author: T.V.Thamilselvi
Bench
