months,
in that eventuality, the respondent is liable to be
ejected on the ground of arrears of rent. Therefore,
issue ... execution of the order
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 19-01-2020 04:08:58 :::
CR-6959-2017(O&M) 3
of ejectment with
issued by the appellant even in the course of
ejectment proceedings as also in execution proceedings towards arrears
of rent were dishonoured. In the light
September 05, 2018.
The said decree was put into execution giving rise to Title Execution Case No.
39 of 2018. The opposite party preferred ... petitioner is that the disposal
of the execution case levied by the petitioners for execution of the ejectment
decree is being deferred on the ground
parties after the passing of an order of ejectment
against the tenant. Dispossession in execution of the order is
not necessary for determination
4110 of 2014
before the petitioner could contest the Execution Petition, the hearing of the
Execution Petition was advanced, in which, the orders have been ... ejectment. The suit was
decreed and the execution petition has been filed, within a period of two
years from the date of the decree. Initially
petitioners.
The petitioners have suffered a decree of ejectment. The
said decree, when was put into execution gives rise to O.C.
Execution Case
decree under
challenge was already executed thereby ejecting the petitioner tenant from the suit premises.
The said execution order was carried out through
ejectment, wherein the court was pleased to decree
the suit and in order to execute the decree, he has
filed the execution petition and same ... suit in O.S.No.7113/2016 for ejectment
which was decreed and the execution proceedings in
the E.P.No.2963/2017 is pending
appellant-wife filed an application for execution of decree dated 06th August, 2001, in the said execution application, the respondent-husband moved an application under ... suit for ejectment against the defendant/tenant in the court of small causes, Ahmedabad, the suit was decreed in his favour. During execution proceedings
ejectment of the appellants/defendants from immovable property, and
axiomatically passing a decree in favour of respondents/plaintiffs and against
the appellants/defendants of ejectment ... passed a decree for ejectment with respect to the said plots and ought to
have confined the decree for ejectment with respect to plot
