plaintiff/decree
holder had initiated execution proceedings. Pending Execution proceedings,
the revision petitioner, who is a third party suit had filed ... ejectment has been decreed as against
the tenants and as a purchaser from the original plaintiff, they are entitled to
prosecute the execution proceedings. According
Sehgal's
petition seeking ejection of the tenant Sh. Vijay Bhandari has been allowed
on 20.10.2008. The execution petition to implement the aforesaid eviction
spite of the order passed by the Tehsildar on 5.2.2018 for ejectment and damages in respect to the plot in question, the order ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question on 5.2.2018.
7. For execution
spite of the order passed by the Tehsildar on 24.6.2025 for ejectment and damages in respect to plot no.452 against respondent ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question on 24.6.2025.
8. For execution
pursuance
thereof, a warrant of ejectment was issued on 10.12.2024 and the
ejectment was duly carried out on 24.12.2024. The petitioner was
duly associated ... informed on the said date during the execution
1
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment
ejectment and damages in respect to the plot in question as well as upon the dismissal of the restoration application and the revision, the order ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed on 15.1.2008 by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question.
7. For execution
ejectment and damages in respect to the plot in question, the order has not been given effect to. He submitted that appropriate direction be issued ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question on 30.5.2013.
7. For execution
which respondent nos.5 to 16 may be evicted after ejecting order dated 16.11.2023 passed by the learned Tahsildar - Deoria, District- Deoria, in Suit ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question on 16.11.2023.
7. For execution
initiated and an order for ejectment and damages was passed in respect to the plot in question against the predecessor of the contesting respondent ... order for ejectment and damages was passed on 28.2.1995 by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question.
7. For execution of the order
ejectment suit has been restored to
the file of the learned trial Judge. However, the
petitioner was dispossessed in execution of the ex
parte decree
