ejectment was ordered. A revision
petition was filed by Gopal Krishan Manik before this Court, which was
dismissed and his ejectment was upheld ... right upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India. Execution of the ejectment order was sought by respondent No.1 and his
brother. Objections
vide which objections filed by the petitioner to the execution
application has been dismissed. Ejectment order dated 03.01.2013 was
passed against the petitioner ... before the learned Rent Controller. The
petitioner, however, continued in possession and execution proceedings
were initiated by the respondent i.e. on 17.04.2018, which were
petitioner's office on 24.07.2015
and proclaimed that an ejectment order had been passed against him that
inquiries were made by the petitioner ... then, that the
ejectment order dated 22.09.2006 came to light and the petitioner came to
know that execution proceedings were pending against
petitioner is claimed to be in arrears of rent since
01.12.2005. Ejectment of the petitioner was sought on account of non-payment of
arrears ... earnest money at the time of execution of the said agreement to sell and
possession of the property was delivered to him in part performance
given facts and
circumstances of the case have rightly ordered ejectment of the petitioners
on the ground of the premises being unfit and unsafe ... that the
petitioners are still in possession of the demised premises and execution
proceedings have yet not attained finality.
It has been held
petitioner and have gone
through the file.
Filing of the petition seeking ejectment of the petitioner on
02.02.2016 on the ground of non-payment ... Punjab
Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, one of the grounds on which ejectment
can be sought is of the tenant ceasing to occupy the premises
that the petitioner is still in
possession of the demised premises and execution proceedings are pending.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances ... case,
learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana, vide order dated 18.11.2017 has rightly
directed ejectment of the petitioner from the demised premises i.e. a shop
possession of other tenants i.e. Raj Kumar etc., against whom ejectment
petitions also stood filed. The learned Rent Controller while observing that
the ground ... shop in dispute had been taken by the respondent-landlord
in execution proceedings on 16.01.2019, he has instructions to contest the
matter on merits
filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India seeking stay of execution of the order dated 6.8.2018
(Annexure P-1), during the pendency ... before the lower Appellate Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ejectment of the
petitioner from the demised premises was ordered by the learned
dated
01.02.2018 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh was allowed and
ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises was ordered.
Following order ... demised
property has been restored to the respondent-landlord in execution
proceedings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to seek
instructions.
Adjourned
