Dr Sanjay Kaushal vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 3 December, 2025
used to convey the idea of any "empty threat" or
something which is ineffective). It was further observed that a victim within
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 868 (1.33 seconds)Vishav Bhooshan Sood vs State Of Punjab And Another on 24 April, 2025
necessary that the threat given is real and the person giving
the threat means it. The threat should be a real and not just ... when the person uttering it does exactly mean what he says. Empty threats
do not mean that any case under Section
Deva Alias Rahul Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 April, 2025
used to convey the idea of an "empty threat" or something which is
ineffective.] . We reiterate that these rights are totally independent,
incomparable
Abdul Rahman vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 March, 2025
concerned, to attract the offence, threat and intention to cause an alarm
are main ingredients. The third ingredient is that the intention must ... prosecution, the alleged threats issued by the petitioners
were only empty threats and they had no effect on the complainant.
14. In this regard
Abdul Rahman vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 March, 2025
concerned, to attract the offence, threat and intention to cause an alarm
are main ingredients. The third ingredient is that the intention must ... prosecution, the alleged threats issued by the petitioners
were only empty threats and they had no effect on the complainant.
14. In this regard
Capt. Ram Kumar ( Retd) vs Rajesh Huda And Anr on 28 June, 2025
cause harm or that the Complainant/Appellant got intimidated.
Mere empty threat was not with the requisite intent to cause harm which is
first essential
M.Purushotham Reddy, vs Shaik Thosif Ahamad Sajid Khan, on 7 November, 2025
used to convey the idea of an
"empty threat" or something which is ineffective.] . We reiterate that these
rights are totally independent, incomparable
Harsh Sharma Alias Chache And Anr vs State Nct Of Delhi And Ors on 2 September, 2025
firearm in a public
setting constitute not only a direct threat to the life of the individual
concerned but also a disruption of public order ... category. The allegation here is
not of mere brandishing or an empty threat; it concerns an actual shot fired
from a pistol at the Complainant
Shruthi Thilak vs The State Rep By on 28 March, 2025
concerned, to attract the offence, threat and intention to cause an alarm
are main ingredients. The third ingredient is that the intention must ... prosecution, the alleged threats issued by the petitioner
were only empty threats and they had no effect on the complainant.
9. In this regard
Shruthi Thilak vs The State Rep. By on 23 April, 2025
concerned, to attract the offence, threat and intention to cause an alarm are
main ingredients. The third ingredient is that the intention must ... prosecution, the alleged threats issued by the petitioner were only empty
threats and they had no effect on the complainant.
12. The above judgements