Deputy Registrar in Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as EPFAT), applicant herein, has filed this Original Application under Section ... reads thus:-
I am directed to refer to your letter No.EPFAT/PO/2010/1 dated 2nd February, 2010 on the above mentioned subject
behalf of the petitioner further that the
impugned order of the learned EPFAT is wholly erroneous and is
liable to be set aside in view ... petitioner has submitted that the impugned order passed by the
learned EPFAT is casual and mechanical without taking note of the
computation of damages along
Being aggrieved, the
establishment preferred an appeal before the learned EPFAT under Section 7I of the Act
alongwith an application seeking waiver of the predeposit ... While entertaining the appeal of the establishment, learned EPFAT directed
the establishment to deposit 50% of the amount instead of stipulated 75% within 30 days
April, 2016 passed by the Employment
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, 'EPFAT'). Vide the said
impugned order, the EPFAT had upheld the order ... upheld vide order dated 16 th
September, 2011 by the EPFAT.
12. During the pendency of the first inquiry, the Petitioner also filed a writ
April, 2016 passed by the Employment
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter, 'EPFAT'). Vide the said
impugned order, the EPFAT had upheld the order ... upheld vide order dated 16 th
September, 2011 by the EPFAT.
12. During the pendency of the first inquiry, the Petitioner also filed a writ
order passed by Employees Provident Fund Appellate
Tribunal (for short "EPFAT") dated 17.10.2012 (Annexure P/18).
2. 2nd respondent - company was established ... damages is concerned,
2nd respondent-company filed an appeal before the EPFAT and appeal was
dismissed on 17.08.2011. Consequently, 2nd respondent - company filed
rectification application
passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for
short 'EPFAT') in appeal being ATA No.94(4)2011, which in turn ... establishment carried the order dated 07.12.2010 in appeal before
the EPFAT, inter alia, on the basis of their assertion that they had deposited
the provident
which the Employees'
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter 'EPFAT') has allowed an
application filed by the Respondent/APFC (hereinafter 'APFC ... impugned order the EPFAT has recalled its earlier order dated 13th April,
2016 by which the appeal of the Petitioner had stood finally allowed
assails the order dated 04.11.2016 of the
Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT) in appeal in
ATA No.94(4)2011 vide which the appeal ... behalf of the APFC (N) it had been contended before the
EPFAT that the "Act" was meant to provide social and financial
security
6207/2016
Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short EPFAT) in
ATA No. 1212(8) of 2015, whereby learned EPFAT has allowed ... recovered it also. The order was challenged by the
Respondent before the EPFAT by filing an appeal. The appeal was allowed
vide order dated
