Being aggrieved, the
establishment preferred an appeal before the learned EPFAT under Section 7I of the Act
alongwith an application seeking waiver of the predeposit ... While entertaining the appeal of the establishment, learned EPFAT directed
the establishment to deposit 50% of the amount instead of stipulated 75% within 30 days
learned Employees'
Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as
'EPFAT'), Delhi in ATA No. 155(20)2012 whereby the appeal filed ... referred to as the 'Act'). Vide order dated 04.03.2011, the EPFAT
remanded the matter back to the Authority with the direction to
ascertain
Presiding Officer, Employees Provident
Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as „the EPFAT‟), New
Delhi in Appeal No. 201(03)2014 whereby the appeal ... also contended on behalf of the petitioner that the EPFAT
failed to appreciate that the proceedings against the petitioner
establishment were initiated after a lapse
Presiding Officer, Employees Provident
Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as „the EPFAT‟), New
Delhi in Appeal No.650(4)2004 whereby the appeal ... also contended on behalf of the petitioner that the EPFAT
failed to appreciate that the proceedings against the petitioner
establishment were initiated after a lapse
Presiding Officer, Employees Provident
Fund Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as „the EPFAT‟), New
Delhi in Appeal No.589(4)2008 whereby the appeal ... said
appeal was admitted by the EPFAT on 19.08.2008 subject to petitioner
depositing 20% of the damage amount within three weeks from the
date
aside and matter is remitted
back to the EPFAT, New Delhi for deciding the appeal afresh on
merits as the grounds raised in the appeal
Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for
short 'EPFAT') setting aside the order of the Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner directing ... noted that
this order was passed on remand directions issued by the EPFAT, New
Delhi in ATA 13(16) 2005 where a specific direction
reliefs:-
1. That impugned order dated 05.07.2011
passed by the Presiding Officer, EPFAT,
New Delhi in ATA No. 164 (3) of 2008 be
set aside
punjab and haryana high court
chandigarh
CWP No. 6426 of 2011 2
EPFAT"), it appears from record that the accumulation of contributions ... time allowed by the
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and not by the EPFAT after the stay
order ceased to operate. No document has been produced
follows :
“20. It is finally submitted that establishment
of a separate EPFAT for southern states of India
has been directed, keeping in view the interest
